As of this post no one has shared that sensational post. Of course the report doesn’t include what happened on each of those 49,340 killed. Of course I won’t be virtue signalling here so I won’t be surprised if others are offended.
The anti-car lobby has this idiotic notion of if you don’t see it their way or talk the way they like, they don’t care what you have to say. Well I have news for others out there, they don’t care what you have to say PERIOD. Stop bending over backwards ( or would that be forward or maybe both? ) to the anti-car lobby bullies, stand up to them.
Otherwise moving on…
A lot of hysteria and blaming drivers again like usual. The anti-car lobby chicken little’s are screaming the sky is falling again.
I will list what won’t fix the problem: complete streets does not create safe streets, you the user create safety, complete streets will not prevent stupidity from pedestrians, bicyclists, or drivers, ‘smart growth’ polices won’t fix any thing, vision zero, more like zero vision, crossing flags, installing flashing lights at cross walks that take away critical thinking, and any other foolish utopian visions.
Federal state local policies and standards, are a major public safety issue, such as the dangerous pedestrian right of way law.
Looking both ways is not even suggested, it is PEDESTRIANS HAVE THE RIGHT AWAY! Which is incorrect, they don’t have 100% right of way at all times, which is another public safety issue.
Education relating to when pedestrians do or don’t have the right of way is another public safety issue.
Jay walkers have to yield to motor vehicle traffic, pedestrians aren’t educated about that. It is clear that education is needed for pedestrians, bicyclists, and any other non-driving activities.
But they don’t want to do that, there is no money to be earned doing it that way. Go ahead and keep trying the dumb way that ends up in failure ( unnecessary deaths ) every time, which is educating drivers only.
Many Pedestrians are unable to navigate across the street, why is that? Do we really need crossing guards to get people across a damn road? It would create jobs, maybe the anti-car lobby can use their time to help others instead of bash drivers.
These anti-car lobby activists are never happy until they get you out of your personal vehicle. The vulnerable user law passed in Wisconsin makes my point. They always want more more more, they are never happy with what they have.
It really would be nice if these anti-car lobbies would take these points in to consideration. Many of these points I made are observations. Some others out there should be able to notice these issues and likely end up with nearly the same conclusion. The anti-car ones won’t due to conformist echo chamber group-think.
Likely this will all be dismissed and labeled a ‘windshield point of view’ by the anti-car lobby.
You must be logged in to post a comment.